" a disaster for the world's wildlife "

a link to the article *

Yesterday I saw an article on The Guardian about the critique what Planet Earth II has got. Planet Earth II is a sequel to Sir David Attenborough’s famous nature series ’Planet Earth’. Martin Hughes-Games (a presenter of BBC’s Springwatch) says: ” David Attenborough’s blockbuster nature series Planet Earth II is ’a disaster for the world’s wildlife’ and a significant contributor to planet-wide extinctions, a rival natural history producer has claimed.” Hughes-Games opinion is that the series don’t show the damage that humans have made to nature.

I think Hughes-Games is partly right. But if we think this from Sir Attenborough’s aspect I can also see his point. His series would lose viewers if they would show the reality because nowadays in many parts of the world the incredible nature has been destroyed by the humans. It would be fair to show the real condition of the worlds nature.

I agree with Hughes-Games when he says that the real condition of the worlds nature should be shown to the viewers. The people would realize better that if we keep living like this, soon we won’t  have a place to live on. There is no second Earth.